Earlier this week, I banned a monomaniac calling himself Wild Man from VP, since he was prone to intellectual dishonesty and insufficiently ...
Earlier this week, I banned a monomaniac calling himself Wild Man from VP, since he was prone to intellectual dishonesty and insufficiently tall for the ride there. The wisdom of that decision was subsequently proved by his all-too-typical response of the gamma scorned, which was to a) continue trying to spread his gospel of Western egalitarianism while b) bitterly complaining about the wrongs done to him in a revisionist account of events.
Of course, he picked the wrong venue for this when he decided to run to the sympathetic embrace of the readers at Chateau Heartiste. This is what a classic Gamma run-for-sympathy looks like:
Lucius Somesuch
Having read your “existential ontological” scribblings at Vox Popoli, Wild Man, with all of your buttkissing “please help me to understand, Good Sir” bowing and scraping, we see what a (((cucky))) midwit trolltard you are.
John Locke is dead. You’re a fucking idiot.
Oh, but a liar too– saruh is that YOU?! lzolzoz . . .
Wild Man
Lucius Fuckwad – you be so dumb …… to confuse the shiv for buttkissing. What else goes over you head buddy? Fuck ….. I bet you be owned by the women in you life.
John Locke inconsequential as to western institutions? …… fuck you stupid (like Beale).
Hesiod
Wild Dude, you got your arse handed to you by Vox Day. Retreating to another blog to cry your gamma dreams of being the once and future king were unjustly robbed does you no good. It’s embarrassing, in fact.
Wild Man
Hesiod – VD didn’t engage – just goes girl-like hissy-fits, except where he tries to counter claim in the most inane way, which is not actually even worthy of sorting out for him it is such nonsense (penguins and satellites are not categorically similar!? -so fucking what; corporations don’t die!? – so fucking what; but forms of life do!? – so fucking what; cognitive science specifically denies even the theoretical possibility of conscious self-agency!? – which is untrue, and besides the point in any event , because the condition of “belief” that I hi-lighted in that respect makes clear the intended phenomeno-ontological aspects of self-agency I was hi-lighting). VD completely misses every point. Voom – goes completely over his head – and I’m apparently the idiot. Hahaha – that be just too rich! His lame attempts for counter claim all fell completely, flat – really stinky-like. I grok that VD has a big problem with respect to understanding information-systems algorithmic approaches – calling for nested categorizations. I think his grasp of logic is actually back somewhere pre-Greek (which is really funny, because he does think he can make claims around the nature of the Graeco-Roman legacy – but apparently he doesn’t have the philosophical chops for that).
Look Hesiod. I was pretty shocked when I saw his post this morning with respect to some of my comments. His handling of the subject matter was just so utterly inept I actually felt bad for the guy (cause you know he is always so much about muh IQ all the time). So …… to ease the discussion towards an equitable (hahaha – VD hates that word) conclusion ….. I ignored the inanity for the time being, and refocused his attention to the one question that just might allow him to see the light (the question around his Alt-Right claims on the Christian legacy). And he freaked again, went all hissy-fit again, and banned me, and avoided the question for the 3rd time. Because he can’t answer the question without modifying one part or the other of his overall narrative. That’s why he didn’t answer. Hesoid – watch – he won’t ever answer that question. To prove it to yourself why don’t you ask him again to see what happens? (the question I put to him at the end of my comment #71). And it’s all because he is a white supremist who wants to pretend he is better than that. So he will fuck himself logic-wise just for the sake of some feelz around virtue-signalling. Jeez – that just be lowly for a man to do.
Hesiod – your man is a poser. That is pathetic. And fuck-off on the gamma shit. I outlined my reasons for posting here as per the first sentence of the first of my comments on this thread.
I leave it to you to decide if I a) failed to engage, b) just went girl-like hissy fits, c) completely missed every point, or d) am a white supremist who wants to pretend I is better than that.
Of course, he picked the wrong venue for this when he decided to run to the sympathetic embrace of the readers at Chateau Heartiste. This is what a classic Gamma run-for-sympathy looks like:
Lucius Somesuch
Having read your “existential ontological” scribblings at Vox Popoli, Wild Man, with all of your buttkissing “please help me to understand, Good Sir” bowing and scraping, we see what a (((cucky))) midwit trolltard you are.
John Locke is dead. You’re a fucking idiot.
Oh, but a liar too– saruh is that YOU?! lzolzoz . . .
Wild Man
Lucius Fuckwad – you be so dumb …… to confuse the shiv for buttkissing. What else goes over you head buddy? Fuck ….. I bet you be owned by the women in you life.
John Locke inconsequential as to western institutions? …… fuck you stupid (like Beale).
Hesiod
Wild Dude, you got your arse handed to you by Vox Day. Retreating to another blog to cry your gamma dreams of being the once and future king were unjustly robbed does you no good. It’s embarrassing, in fact.
Wild Man
Hesiod – VD didn’t engage – just goes girl-like hissy-fits, except where he tries to counter claim in the most inane way, which is not actually even worthy of sorting out for him it is such nonsense (penguins and satellites are not categorically similar!? -so fucking what; corporations don’t die!? – so fucking what; but forms of life do!? – so fucking what; cognitive science specifically denies even the theoretical possibility of conscious self-agency!? – which is untrue, and besides the point in any event , because the condition of “belief” that I hi-lighted in that respect makes clear the intended phenomeno-ontological aspects of self-agency I was hi-lighting). VD completely misses every point. Voom – goes completely over his head – and I’m apparently the idiot. Hahaha – that be just too rich! His lame attempts for counter claim all fell completely, flat – really stinky-like. I grok that VD has a big problem with respect to understanding information-systems algorithmic approaches – calling for nested categorizations. I think his grasp of logic is actually back somewhere pre-Greek (which is really funny, because he does think he can make claims around the nature of the Graeco-Roman legacy – but apparently he doesn’t have the philosophical chops for that).
Look Hesiod. I was pretty shocked when I saw his post this morning with respect to some of my comments. His handling of the subject matter was just so utterly inept I actually felt bad for the guy (cause you know he is always so much about muh IQ all the time). So …… to ease the discussion towards an equitable (hahaha – VD hates that word) conclusion ….. I ignored the inanity for the time being, and refocused his attention to the one question that just might allow him to see the light (the question around his Alt-Right claims on the Christian legacy). And he freaked again, went all hissy-fit again, and banned me, and avoided the question for the 3rd time. Because he can’t answer the question without modifying one part or the other of his overall narrative. That’s why he didn’t answer. Hesoid – watch – he won’t ever answer that question. To prove it to yourself why don’t you ask him again to see what happens? (the question I put to him at the end of my comment #71). And it’s all because he is a white supremist who wants to pretend he is better than that. So he will fuck himself logic-wise just for the sake of some feelz around virtue-signalling. Jeez – that just be lowly for a man to do.
Hesiod – your man is a poser. That is pathetic. And fuck-off on the gamma shit. I outlined my reasons for posting here as per the first sentence of the first of my comments on this thread.
I leave it to you to decide if I a) failed to engage, b) just went girl-like hissy fits, c) completely missed every point, or d) am a white supremist who wants to pretend I is better than that.
No comments:
Post a Comment